Event Match Quality (EMQ) directly impacts attribution accuracy, optimization efficiency, and overall return on ad spend. If you do not have access to developers or backend systems, you can still perform a structured, data-driven audit to identify gaps and improve match rates.
Why Event Match Quality Matters
Event Match Quality is a score that indicates how effectively customer event data can be matched to user profiles within advertising platforms. Higher match rates improve attribution, retargeting precision, and conversion modeling.
Industry benchmarks show:
-
Increasing match rates from 4/10 to 7/10 can improve attributed conversions by 10–25%.
-
Adding advanced matching parameters (email, phone, external IDs) can increase match rates by 20–40%.
-
Poor match quality can reduce retargeting audience size by 30% or more.
For performance marketers, EMQ directly affects:
-
Cost per acquisition (CPA)
-
Return on ad spend (ROAS)
-
Campaign optimization signals
-
Audience accuracy
Auditing EMQ should be part of your ongoing performance governance framework.
Step 1: Review Platform Diagnostics and Event Coverage
Even without developer access, most advertising platforms provide diagnostics dashboards.
Focus on:
-
Event coverage: Which key events are firing (ViewContent, AddToCart, Purchase, Lead)?
-
Event volume consistency: Sudden drops may indicate tracking issues.
-
Deduplication status (browser vs server events).
-
Match quality score per event type.
Create a simple audit table including:
-
Event name
-
Daily volume
-
EMQ score
-
Advanced matching enabled (Yes/No)
-
Notes
This provides a baseline before you escalate anything internally.
Step 2: Analyze Parameter Completeness
Most match issues stem from missing or incomplete user identifiers.
High-impact parameters typically include:
-
Email (hashed)
-
Phone number (hashed)
-
First and last name
-
ZIP/postal code
-
Country
-
External ID
Without backend access, you can still:
-
Use browser inspection tools to verify which parameters are present.
-
Review event payload previews inside the ad platform.
-
Compare high-performing campaigns against low-performing ones.
If Purchase events have lower match quality than Lead events, that signals inconsistent identifier capture at checkout.
Statistically, including both email and phone can increase match probability by 30% compared to using email alone.
Step 3: Compare Funnel Stage Match Rates
Segment EMQ by funnel stage:
-
Top of funnel (ViewContent)
-
Mid-funnel (AddToCart)
-
Bottom of funnel (Purchase)
Patterns to watch:
-
High top-of-funnel EMQ but low purchase EMQ → checkout form not passing identifiers.
-
Low across all stages → advanced matching not implemented correctly.
-
Large discrepancy between browser and server events → deduplication issues.
Document discrepancies with quantified differences (e.g., “Purchase EMQ 4.5/10 vs AddToCart 7.2/10”). This strengthens your internal case when requesting technical changes.
Step 4: Evaluate Deduplication and Signal Overlap
If both browser and server-side events are active, confirm:
-
Event IDs match between sources.
-
Deduplication is recognized by the ad platform.
-
Server events are not missing key identifiers.
Improper deduplication can inflate event volume while lowering effective match quality. In some cases, correcting deduplication improves attributed ROAS by 10–15% due to cleaner optimization signals.
Even without code access, you can validate this using event testing tools and diagnostics sections.
Step 5: Cross-Reference Audience Sizes
Another indirect method to audit match quality is audience validation.
Compare:
-
Website visitors vs retargetable audience size
-
AddToCart events vs dynamic product audience size
-
Purchase events vs excluded purchasers audience
If retargetable audiences are 30–50% smaller than expected traffic volume, poor match quality is often the cause.
Calculate:
Retargetable Audience / Total Event Volume = Effective Match Ratio
This approximation helps quantify the scale of signal loss.
Step 6: Conduct a Controlled Identifier Test
If possible, run a limited test:
-
Create a dedicated landing page.
-
Ensure all form fields are completed (email, phone, full name).
-
Compare EMQ against standard traffic.
Marketers often observe a 15–35% EMQ increase when complete identifiers are consistently captured.
This test does not require backend modification if you already control form structures.
Step 7: Prepare a Technical Action Brief
Once your audit is complete, compile a structured request for developers including:
-
Current EMQ by event
-
Missing parameters
-
Estimated performance impact
-
Recommended fixes (advanced matching, hashing standardization, deduplication alignment)
Present quantified projections, such as:
-
+20% improvement in match rate could increase attributed conversions by 12–18%.
-
Improved signal quality may reduce CPA by 8–15%.
Developers respond better to quantified business cases than abstract optimization requests.
Common Root Causes of Low Event Match Quality
-
Missing hashing or improper hashing format
-
Email collected only after purchase confirmation
-
Phone not standardized with country code
-
Inconsistent external ID usage
-
Consent gating blocking identifier transmission
-
Broken deduplication between browser and server events
Identifying which of these applies is possible through structured observation, even without repository access.
Key Metrics to Track Over Time
After implementing improvements, monitor:
-
Event Match Quality score per event
-
Attributed conversions
-
Retargeting audience growth
-
CPA and ROAS shifts
-
Server-to-browser event ratio
Improvements should appear within 7–14 days depending on event volume.
Conclusion
You do not need developer credentials to perform a meaningful Event Match Quality audit. By combining diagnostics review, parameter inspection, funnel-stage comparison, audience validation, and controlled testing, marketers can identify signal gaps with precision.
In high-competition advertising environments, improving match quality is often more impactful than increasing budget. A structured audit process ensures your optimization algorithms receive the strongest possible signals.
Recommended Reading
For deeper insight into tracking accuracy and signal optimization, consider exploring:
Strengthening your event signal infrastructure is one of the highest-leverage actions available to performance teams today.
